The information on this page has been prepared with reference to published scientific literature, not by a medically qualified expert. It is not medical advice. Any decision to use a supplement or herb-based product is your responsibility. Consult a suitably qualified medical professional, especially if you have underlying conditions. Remember, nothing is for everyone, and not everything sold is what it claims to be. Some things work for some people, some of the time.
Nettle, primarily Urtica dioica (common/stinging nettle), has been used medicinally for centuries. This review examines contemporary scientific evidence regarding its therapeutic properties, active constituents, and clinical applications.
The Urtica genus primarily includes Urtica dioica (common stinging nettle), which is most frequently studied and used medicinally. Other species include Urtica urens (dwarf nettle), Urtica pilulifera (Roman nettle), and Urtica angustifolia (narrow-leaved nettle). These species are collectively known as nettles, stinging nettles, or common nettles. They belong to the Urticaceae family and are characterized by fine hairs (trichomes) containing irritating chemicals that cause a stinging sensation upon contact.
Plants sometimes confused with nettle include white dead-nettle (Lamium album), which despite its name, belongs to the mint family (Lamiaceae) and lacks stinging properties, and wood nettle (Laportea canadensis), which is related but belongs to a different genus.
Nettle leaves are rich in flavonoids, carotenoids, vitamins (particularly A, C, K, and B complex), minerals (iron, calcium, magnesium, and potassium), amino acids, chlorophyll, and polyphenols. The leaves also contain bioactive compounds such as histamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and formic acid in the stinging hairs.
Scientific evidence supports several therapeutic applications of nettle leaf:
Nettle root contains different bioactive compounds than the leaves, including β-sitosterol, scopoletin, sterols, lignans (particularly (-)-3,4-divanillyltetrahydrofuran), and polysaccharides. These compounds contribute to its distinct therapeutic profile:
Dosage recommendations from clinical studies vary by preparation method and intended therapeutic use:
Most clinical studies utilize standardized extracts rather than whole plant material, which allows for more consistent dosing and more reliable results. However, standardization parameters vary across studies and commercial products, complicating direct comparisons.
Nettle is generally recognized as safe when used at recommended dosages, though several side effects and contraindications should be noted:
Few studies have examined doses substantially exceeding the therapeutic ranges mentioned above. Limited toxicological investigations in animal models suggest nettle has a high safety margin, with no observed adverse effects at doses several times higher than typically recommended for humans when adjusted for body weight.
A notable knowledge gap exists regarding the long-term effects of high-dose supplementation. Most clinical trials have been of relatively short duration (2-16 weeks), leaving questions about safety and efficacy of extended use. Additionally, dose-response relationships have not been comprehensively characterized for most indications, and optimal standardization parameters remain undetermined.
Research examining potential benefits of higher doses is particularly lacking for nettle leaf preparations, while nettle root extracts have been studied at various concentrations for BPH, with diminishing returns observed above 600 mg of standardized extract daily.
Scientific evidence most strongly supports the use of nettle root for BPH and nettle leaf for allergic rhinitis and inflammatory conditions. While traditional uses encompass a much broader range of applications, many of these remain inadequately investigated by modern clinical research methodologies. The generally favorable safety profile and preliminary evidence for multiple therapeutic actions warrant further investigation, particularly regarding optimal dosing regimens, standardization approaches, and long-term safety.
Ahangarpour, A., Mohammadian, M., & Dianat, M. (2012). Antidiabetic effect of hydroalcholic Urtica dioica leaf extract in male rats with fructose-induced insulin resistance. Iranian journal of medical sciences, 37(3), 181.
Domola, M. S., Vu, V., Robson‐Doucette, C. A., Sweeney, G., & Wheeler, M. B. (2010). Insulin mimetics in Urtica dioica: structural and computational analyses of Urtica dioica extracts. Phytotherapy research, 24(S2), S175-S182.
Đurović, S., Kojić, I., Radić, D., Smyatskaya, Y. A., Bazarnova, J. G., Filip, S., & Tosti, T. (2024). Chemical constituents of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.): A comprehensive review on phenolic and polyphenolic compounds and their bioactivity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(6), 3430.
Goswami, N. G., Koli, M., Singh, A., & Giri, D. (2022). Urtica dioica: An undervalued herb a comprehensive review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 11(3), 169-173.
Lopatkin, N., Sivkov, A., Schläfke, S., Funk, P., Medvedev, A., & Engelmann, U. (2007). Efficacy and safety of a combination of Sabal and Urtica extract in lower urinary tract symptoms—long-term follow-up of a placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. International Urology and Nephrology, 39, 1137-1146.
Mahboubi, M. (2020). Urtica dioica in the management of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The Natural Products Journal, 10(5), 535-542.
Nahata, A., & Dixit, V. K. (2012). Ameliorative effects of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica) on testosterone‐induced prostatic hyperplasia in rats. Andrologia, 44, 396-409.
Roschek Jr, B., Fink, R.C., McMichael, M. and Alberte, R.S., 2009. Nettle extract (Urtica dioica) affects key receptors and enzymes associated with allergic rhinitis. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives, 23(7), pp.920-926.
Riehemann, K., Behnke, B., & Schulze-Osthoff, K. (1999). Plant extracts from stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), an antirheumatic remedy, inhibit the proinflammatory transcription factor NF-κB. FEBS letters, 442(1), 89-94.
Semalty, M., Adhikari, L., Semwal, D., Chauhan, A., Mishra, A., Kotiyal, R., & Semalty, A. (2017). A comprehensive review on phytochemistry and pharmacological effects of stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). Current Traditional Medicine, 3(3), 156-167.